Dilated Eye Exams For Medicare Beneficiaries Cost Effective, USA



A study published Online First in the Archives of Ophthalmology, one of the JAMA/Archives journals, suggests that it "would be highly cost-effective" to replace visual acuity screenings for new Medicare enrollees with coverage of a dilated eye exam for healthy patients who enter the government insurance program for the elderly.
At the age of 65 years, individuals are able to enroll in Medicare. As part of a Welcome to Medicare health evaluation ,within 12 months of enrollment, they are supposed to receive a visual acuity screening and other preventive health checks. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reversed its 1996 recommendation in 2009, in favor of visual acuity screening, because of insufficient evidence to support it. At present, it is undecided whether Medicare will continue to include visual acuity screening in its initial preventive physical examination.
The researchers comment:
"Our results support the conclusions of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that currently recommended visual acuity screening in primary care settings cannot be demonstrated to result in meaningfully different outcomes than no screening."

David B. Rein, Ph.D., of Public Health Research at NORC at the University of Chicago, and his team, gathered data on 50,000 simulated patients who matched demographic characteristics to 65 year olds. They used a Monte Carlo cost-effectiveness simulation model and excluded patients with diabetes, given that the cost-effectiveness of visual screening for these patients has been established and also excluded those with diagnosed eye disease.
The findings indicate that dilated eye evaluations increased quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.008 and increased costs by $94, when compared with a no-screening policy. The researchers established that visual acuity screening raised QALYs in less than 95% of the simulations with an increase in total costs of $32 per person.
They conclude:
"Our research suggests that the current policy of visual acuity screening is a suboptimal use of resources and that replacing this policy with coverage of a dilated eye evaluation for all healthy patients entering Medicare would be highly cost-effective."

Writen by Petra Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
20 May 2012 22:47:30

Battleship Movie Review

SlashGear Battleship Movie Review SlashGear The visual effects in this film are second to none, and there are a handful of excellent or otherwise famous actors onboard, but know this right out of the gate: the most interesting character you're going to meet is the USS Missouri. 'Battleship': Glub, glub Hamish Linklater as Cal 'Battleship' Confusion: A Few Theories On Berg's Leaky Vessel From Junkfood Cinema
20 May 2012 20:06:51

Smarter Way to Dial Up Visual Aid

Smarter Way to Dial Up Visual Aid dailyRx One of the best kept secrets for aiding individuals with visual impairments may be sitting in your purse or your back pocket. Your smartphone may be a tool that provides more accessibility than you thought. Smartphones offer numerous apps and tools ...
20 May 2012 18:55:29

Visual protest against proposed art gallery

Visual protest against proposed art gallery The Ashburton Guardian He said he does not know who has organised this latest visual protest, but thought it was "quite clever". The signs, one being a white wooden elephant cut-out and others saying things such as "Wrong place, wrong time, wrong price" and "How long until ...

Keywords:

visual, visual acuity, favor visual, replace visual, receive visual, visual screening, continue visual, established visual, policy visual, recommended visual